On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 06:25:57PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 02:33:02PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > The perl 4 libraries are more interesting; there are 127 packages
> > which appear to have files which use one or more of them. In many cases
> > it's likely
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 02:33:02PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> The perl 4 libraries are more interesting; there are 127 packages
> which appear to have files which use one or more of them. In many cases
> it's likely that the files which use them either aren't installed, or
> aren't used if
On 2011-08-07 15:33, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> [CCing lintian maintainers in case they offer any relevant advice]
>
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:13:54PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:07:14PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
Yet to analyze: Devel::Dprof an
[CCing lintian maintainers in case they offer any relevant advice]
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:13:54PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:07:14PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > Yet to analyze: Devel::Dprof and Perl4::CoreLibs. Assuming that wheezy
> > > releases
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:07:14PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:19:32PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > I don't think it is. If we're going to care about partial upgrades
> > at all, we may as well make them work robustly, and turn those
> > relationships int
Source: perl
Severity: wishlist
I'm making this a bug to make sure it doesn't drop off the radar,
since it's going to take a bit of monitoring and occasional action.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:19:32PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 02:48:01PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
