Hi Francesco,
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 07:22:27PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote [edited]:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:09:43 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> The current apt-listbugs text user interface displays the bugs that
> affect the installation/upgrade and then offers the user the following
> pos
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:09:43 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi guys,
Hi Serafeim (and sorry for the very late follow-up),
>
> Attached a proof-of-concept for the advanced use case (in which the user
> actually wants to review which buggy packages to pin or upgrade). Consider
> this as a basi
On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:09:43 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Attached a proof-of-concept
[...]
Hi Serafeim,
I'll struggle to find a little bit of time soon to analyze what you
sent.
Sorry for not reacting quicker than that... :-(
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-tr
Hi guys,
Attached a proof-of-concept for the advanced use case (in which the user
actually wants to review which buggy packages to pin or upgrade). Consider
this as a basis for further discussion, rather than something anywhere near a
working patch.
To give it a try, save the attached files in th
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:03:28 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
[...]
> I think technical minded users would appreciate the same level of options
> currently provided by apt-get ran as root, ie. to be able to upgrade selected
> RC-buggy packages while pinning others.
To me, it is of paramount import
Hi guys,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:07:20AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:34:03 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
>
> [...]
> > On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
[..]
>ยท -n, --force-no Assumes that you select no for all questions.
>This option is assume
On 19 March 2013 07:07, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:34:03 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
>> What follows is a somewhat
>> verbose justification and answer to some of your previous questions.
>> Responses should go to #628996 only, please.
>
> Excluding your address and also Serafei
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:33:11 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
[...]
> Francesco, implementation details aside, are you OK with the direction?
More or less, but I believe that implementing a debconf frontend for
apt-listbugs is not a small change: hence, I think it should be seen as
a mid-term/long
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:34:03 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
[...]
> On 17 March 2013 16:17, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:41:52 +0800 Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> Debconf may provide a suitable interface there
> >
> > Please see the bug log of #628996 for more details
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 08:00:51PM +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
> On 18 March 2013 18:56, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
[..]
> > If I understand correctly, debconf can only be used with predefined
> > templates,
> > thus predefined generic policy questions (as opposed to questions that can
> > be
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
