Hi,
I build a package from SVN r67 with the patch
--- parti-all-0.0.7.21+20110601r67.orig/xpra/server.py
+++ parti-all-0.0.7.21+20110601r67/xpra/server.py
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
# any other interesting metadata? _NET_WM_TYPE, WM_TRANSIENT_FOR,
etc.?
# This is just a hack to allow us to test (se
Hi,
here's xev output when I hit altgr-<
normally
garfield:~$ DISPLAY=:0 xev
KeyPress event, serial 33, synthetic NO, window 0x4e1,
root 0x110, subw 0x0, time 453848236, (63,97), root:(71,170),
state 0x0, keycode 108 (keysym 0xfe03, ISO_Level3_Shift),
same_screen YES,
Antoine Martin writes:
> Unless someone can come up with a better scheme, I think we will merge
> this simple code as it seems to improve things somewhat. What do you
> think?
If it does not cause any extra harm then why not. However, I still need
something better :-)
-Timo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On 06/01/2011 04:21 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [ Antoine, I'm sending a copy of my mails to
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628773 since your
> version of xpra does not have bug tracking system. If you wish to reply
> there you can just mail 628...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
[ Antoine, I'm sending a copy of my mails to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628773 since your
version of xpra does not have bug tracking system. If you wish to reply
there you can just mail 628...@bugs.debian.org and Cc: me.]
Antoine Martin writes:
> That's interesting, the
5 matches
Mail list logo