On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:10:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Le mardi 10 mai 2011 à 10:59 +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit :
> > Le lundi 09 mai 2011 à 17:11 +0200, Guido Günther a écrit :
> > > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:02:07PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > > > Package: virt-manager
> > > >
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:38:27AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> Once libvirt's shutdown will properly restore the net as before it was
> launched, I believe it will be much better for virt-manager to be able to
> proceed with net reconfigurations.
>
FWIW https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:10:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> Ah, maybe you meant 0.9.0 of libvirt-bin (doesn't even seem to be a
> 0.9.0 of virt-manager on upstream download page :-/ )?
>
Most probably yes. Sorry, I hadn't noticed the reaffectation to libvirt-bin.
> But I have it already
Le mardi 10 mai 2011 à 10:59 +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit :
> Le lundi 09 mai 2011 à 17:11 +0200, Guido Günther a écrit :
> > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:02:07PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > > Package: virt-manager
> > > Version: 0.8.7-1
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > This
Le lundi 09 mai 2011 à 17:11 +0200, Guido Günther a écrit :
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:02:07PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > Package: virt-manager
> > Version: 0.8.7-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > This looks similar to what is reported in #615907, but relates to NAT-ed
> > local
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:02:07PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Package: virt-manager
> Version: 0.8.7-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi.
>
> This looks similar to what is reported in #615907, but relates to NAT-ed
> local network.
Could you check 0.9.0. I've fixed something there that could be the
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 03:02:07PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> This looks similar to what is reported in #615907, but relates to NAT-ed
> local network.
>
> Here's the traceback I get when I create a "default" network with these
> parameters :
> 192.168.122.0/24
> gateway : 192.16
Package: virt-manager
Version: 0.8.7-1
Severity: normal
Hi.
This looks similar to what is reported in #615907, but relates to NAT-ed local
network.
Here's the traceback I get when I create a "default" network with these
parameters :
192.168.122.0/24
gateway : 192.168.122.1
netwmask : 255.255.2
8 matches
Mail list logo