Simon Baatz wrote (28 Jun 2012 18:21:28 GMT) :
> This seems to be another instance of VIVT L1 caching weirdness.
> The problem has been discussed years ago on the arm kernel mailing
> list (see [1]) and a patch has been proposed at that time.
> Apparently, that never made it into the kernel.
Thank
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 12:20:05AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> shawn wrote (17 Jun 2012 03:13:04 GMT) :
> > on 3.4 (custom) + sheevaplug:
>
> > $ gcc -O0 625828.c
> > $ ./a.out
> > ok 1 - got 2000, expected 2000
>
> I asked for more thorough testing, and shawn reported
> "I ran it 500 times, it s
shawn wrote (17 Jun 2012 03:13:04 GMT) :
> on 3.4 (custom) + sheevaplug:
> $ gcc -O0 625828.c
> $ ./a.out
> ok 1 - got 2000, expected 2000
I asked for more thorough testing, and shawn reported
"I ran it 500 times, it succeeded only 191 of those times."
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ ht
hi,
Niko Tyni wrote (14 May 2011 06:23:36 GMT) :
> I have narrowed the problem down to the attached pure C test case,
> which fails almost all the time for me on abel.d.o but never
> anywhere else I've tried.
This test case still fails almost all of the time on abel.d.o
(2.6.32, armv5tel).
Given
shawn wrote (17 Jun 2012 03:13:04 GMT) :
> on 3.4 (custom) + sheevaplug:
> $ gcc -O0 625828.c
> $ ./a.out
> ok 1 - got 2000, expected 2000
Thank you!
Can you please run it a few dozen of times, instead of just once?
(Rationale: I've seen it pass the first time on abel.d.o, then fail
most of t
on 3.4 (custom) + sheevaplug:
$ gcc -O0 625828.c
$ ./a.out
ok 1 - got 2000, expected 2000
--
-Shawn Landden
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi debian-arm,
Niko Tyni wrote (14 May 2011 06:23:36 GMT) :
> @debian-arm: could some porters please test this (running it a dozen
> times or so to see how consistent the result is) and report back with
> the results and kernel versions? Please compile it without optimization,
> otherwise the memo
On Sat, May 14, 2011, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > I can reproduce this on abel.debian.org with both squeeze (Perl 5.10)
> > and sid (5.12), but not on agricola.debian.org at all. Either kernel or
> > hardware specific? I see from the build log that arnold.debian.org (the
> > buildd) is running "Linux 2.6.
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:43:55AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:38:42PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Package: libipc-sharelite-perl
> > Version: 0.17-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: wheezy sid
> > User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: perl-5.12-transition
> >
>
unblock 619117 by 625828
thanks
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:16:09PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Maybe we should postpone this, and solve the immediate Perl 5.12
> testing migration problem with a a porter binary upload built on
> agricola.debian.org (but leave this bug open as RC of course.)
>
> Ther
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:31:39PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:43:55AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:38:42PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > Package: libipc-sharelite-perl
> > > Version: 0.17-1
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Tags: wheezy sid
>
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:43:55AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:38:42PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Package: libipc-sharelite-perl
> > Version: 0.17-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: wheezy sid
> > User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: perl-5.12-transition
> >
>
tags 625828 + squeeze
thanks
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:38:42PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: libipc-sharelite-perl
> Version: 0.17-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: perl-5.12-transition
>
> This package failed to build on armel only ag
Package: libipc-sharelite-perl
Version: 0.17-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: perl-5.12-transition
This package failed to build on armel only against Perl 5.12.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libipc-sharelite-perl&arch=armel&ver=0
14 matches
Mail list logo
