Bug#625522: glibc: causes segfault in Xorg

2011-05-07 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:25:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:30:35PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Le 04/05/2011 07:42, Steve M. Robbins a écrit : > > > P.S. I tried rebuilding glibc myself locally, but gcc also segfaults > > > in the process :-( > > > > Are yo

Bug#625522: glibc: causes segfault in Xorg

2011-05-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:30:35PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Le 04/05/2011 07:42, Steve M. Robbins a écrit : > > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:10:48AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > > >> Sounds like http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518 > >> which is fixed (sort of) by commit 0

Bug#625522: glibc: causes segfault in Xorg

2011-05-04 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Le 04/05/2011 14:02, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> Except that package rebuild doesn't mean a new upload (e.g binNMUs). > > Yes, it would be painful if many packages have bugs of this kind. > Open source projects tend to check for this (and I've never run into > it after

Bug#625522: glibc: causes segfault in Xorg

2011-05-04 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Except that package rebuild doesn't mean a new upload (e.g binNMUs). Yes, it would be painful if many packages have bugs of this kind. Open source projects tend to check for this (and I've never run into it after using libc 2.13 for a while) but I could easily be underesti