Bug#625278: Prioritization of broken symlink issues

2014-02-22 Thread Dave Steele
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:29:49PM -0500, Dave Steele wrote: > > 1) How does lintian know to issue this warning? Does it download > > piuparts results? > > I am afraid that by manual interaction. Both work differently, lintian > works > on

Bug#625278: Prioritization of broken symlink issues

2014-02-21 Thread Agustin Martin
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:29:49PM -0500, Dave Steele wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Agustin Martin wrote: > > Anyway, I think this will be fixed before we reach that point. But something > > like > > > > stage a) lintian warning + piuparts warning > > stage b) lintian error + piupart

Bug#625278: Prioritization of broken symlink issues

2014-02-17 Thread Dave Steele
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Agustin Martin wrote: > Anyway, I think this will be fixed before we reach that point. But something > like > > stage a) lintian warning + piuparts warning > stage b) lintian error + piuparts error > > would have IMHO be a better approach, even if the time betwee

Bug#625278: Prioritization of broken symlink issues

2014-02-17 Thread Agustin Martin
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 01:40:18PM -0500, Dave Steele wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Agustin Martin > > Sorry again if I look unpolite, I am just after lunch and a bit > > overheated. Debian policy must be stated directly by Debian policy, > > not indirectly by whatever package requirem

Bug#625278: Prioritization of broken symlink issues

2014-02-16 Thread Dave Steele
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Agustin Martin wrote: > 2014-02-15 5:47 GMT+01:00 Dave Steele : >> Hi Agustin, >> >> On the subject of TODO list priorities, note that the Piupart broken symlink >> test is likely to be elevated soon, returning an error result rather than a >> warning. > > Hi Davi

Bug#625278: Prioritization of broken symlink issues

2014-02-16 Thread Agustin Martin
2014-02-15 5:47 GMT+01:00 Dave Steele : > On Tue, 3 May 2011, Agustin Martin wrote: >>On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:05:09AM +0200, J G Miller wrote: >>> Package: dictionaries-common >>> Version: 1.10.6 >>> Severity: normal >>> >>> The dictionaries-common package contains two dangling symbolic links >>

Bug#625278: Prioritization of broken symlink issues

2014-02-14 Thread Dave Steele
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Agustin Martin wrote: >On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 05:05:09AM +0200, J G Miller wrote: >> Package: dictionaries-common >> Version: 1.10.6 >> Severity: normal >> >> The dictionaries-common package contains two dangling symbolic links >> in /usr/lib/ispell >> >> 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root ro