Nicolas François wrote:
> Just alignment in case of future changes:
> * Copyright (c) 2011 , Jonathan Nieder
> * Copyright (c) 2011 - 2142, Nicolas François
I see. I suppose I'd rather see
* Copyright (c) 2011,Jonathan Nieder
* Copyright (c) 2011 - 2142, Nicolas François
bu
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:22:05PM -0500, jrnie...@gmail.com wrote:
> Nicolas François wrote:
>
> > Would you agree to the attached change?
>
> Yes, looks fine to me, except:
>
> > - * Copyright (c) 2011, Jonathan Nieder
> > + * Copyright (c) 2011 , Jonathan Nieder
>
> What is this change
Nicolas François wrote:
> Would you agree to the attached change?
Yes, looks fine to me, except:
> - * Copyright (c) 2011, Jonathan Nieder
> + * Copyright (c) 2011, Jonathan Nieder
What is this change about?
> The intent is to get consistent headers / licenses for the different parts
>
Hi,
Would you agree to the attached change?
The intent is to get consistent headers / licenses for the different parts
of shadow-utils.
Best Regards,
--
Nekral
Index: lib/spawn.c
===
--- lib/spawn.c (révision 3475)
+++ lib/spawn.c
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas François wrote:
> There could be two options:
> * test if nscd exists and is executable
> * get rid of posix_spawn, replace by fork & exec abd report errors,
>except for ENOENT
Thanks for looking into this. As you might have guessed, my first
impression was to dislike
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 04:55:55AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Questions:
>
> * This ignores failure to nscd on platforms reporting it through
> WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status) == 127 but considers it an
> error when it comes from the return value of posix_spawn. Which
Package: passwd
Version: 1:4.1.4.2+svn3283-3
Severity: minor
Justification: cosmetic
Tags: upstream
Hi,
With libc implementations (like glibc on hurd) that can return an
exec(2) error from posix_spawn, if nscd is not installed then useradd
and userdel write
Failed to flush the nscd cache
7 matches
Mail list logo
