Bug#622345: imagej: still the same with Squeeze...

2011-12-15 Thread Martin Weiser
Hi Andreas, thank You for your patience. ImageJ now works OK. I do not know the reason (lame answer, I know) - therefore I did not send a message, as I do not know what the cure was. What may be the cause: after one of the updates, the machine died after restart (no reaction on keyboard input

Bug#622345: imagej: still the same with Squeeze...

2011-12-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Matrtin, do you continuosely observe this problem? If yes, could you please follow the instructions given by Michael below? If it is not possible to reproduce the problem I'm tempted to lower the severity of this problem. Kind regards Andreas. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:53:54PM +0

Bug#622345: imagej: still the same with Squeeze...

2011-07-22 Thread Michael Schutte
Hi Martin! On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 02:25:11AM +0200, Martin Weiser wrote: > Here is the sample session: > > louskacek@zouzel:~$ imagej > Open other images in this ImageJ panel as follows: > imagej -p 1 [ ... ] > > #guess what happens here :-) > #yes, you are right, the main panel appears and

Bug#622345: imagej: still the same with Squeeze...

2011-04-16 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 02:25:11AM +0200, Martin Weiser wrote: > I upgraded to Squeeze (with ImageJ from Sid, ver. 1.45e-1), but it did not > make things better (neither did Squeeze's original version). > Any other idea how to solve this? No. I do not have any idea at all. There are no other re

Bug#622345: imagej: still the same with Squeeze...

2011-04-15 Thread Martin Weiser
Package: imagej Version: 1.45e-1 Severity: normal Hi, I upgraded to Squeeze (with ImageJ from Sid, ver. 1.45e-1), but it did not make things better (neither did Squeeze's original version). Any other idea how to solve this? Around me there are some Windows machines and ImageJ seems to run smoothl