Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-27 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 04/09/2011 12:46 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: > > I'm attaching the corresponding gcc-linaro backport from bzr r99440. > > Linaro should forward this upstream. will pick it up from there. Sure; Ramana offered to do so, but didn't have time before his l

Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-23 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04/09/2011 12:46 AM, Loïc Minier wrote: I'm attaching the corresponding gcc-linaro backport from bzr r99440. Linaro should forward this upstream. will pick it up from there. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-08 Thread Loïc Minier
I'm attaching the corresponding gcc-linaro backport from bzr r99440. -- Loïc Minier === modified file 'ChangeLog.linaro' --- ChangeLog.linaro 2010-11-27 15:24:12 + +++ ChangeLog.linaro 2010-11-27 15:30:38 + @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +2010-11-24 Chung-Lin Tang + + 2010-07-08 Ramana Radhakrishn

Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-08 Thread Loïc Minier
Hey I don't know whether a new bug should be opened in the GCC bugzilla or not for the 4.5 branch, but this is the 4.6 bugfix: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44768#c9 (this comment links it to our problem) Mageia has a backported patch: http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/

Bug#621420: Misbuilds busybox on ARM

2011-04-06 Thread Loïc Minier
Package: gcc-4.5 Version: 4.5.2-8 Severity: normal Hi See Debian #621137; gcc-4.5 4.5.2-8 misbuilds busybox: r5 is clobbered in tryexec() as gcc believes it doesn't return, but it does. This doesn't happen with Linaro GCC 4.5 or GCC 4.6, but it does happen with plain FSF 4.5.2. I'v