>> But unless there are actually cases of recent failures in the upgrade
>> procedure (say from 4.6 up), then I would say that this is just legacy
>> from ancient times which everybody follows "just to be sure"...
>
> Russ is correct, you are incorrect. Using the BDB tools to do upgrades of
> the
--On Friday, May 13, 2011 6:55 PM +0200 Ondřej Surý
wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 18:25, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ondřej Surý writes:
I share your concern and I am not saying you should build-depend
openldap on libdb-dev, but that:
a) you could store the compiled-in version and compare it
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 18:25, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ondřej Surý writes:
>
>> I share your concern and I am not saying you should build-depend
>> openldap on libdb-dev, but that:
>
>> a) you could store the compiled-in version and compare it to used
>> version (and do the upgrade if they differ)
Ondřej Surý writes:
> I share your concern and I am not saying you should build-depend
> openldap on libdb-dev, but that:
> a) you could store the compiled-in version and compare it to used
> version (and do the upgrade if they differ)
> b) do the upgrade without dump&load, by running dbNEW_upg
Steve,
I share your concern and I am not saying you should build-depend
openldap on libdb-dev, but that:
a) you could store the compiled-in version and compare it to used
version (and do the upgrade if they differ)
b) do the upgrade without dump&load, by running dbNEW_upgrade on them
That would
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 01:58:15PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> I have prepared automatic Berkeley DB version upgrade script for sks,
> if you want me to do something similar for openldap just ping me, it's
> not a big deal after all :)
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=30;filename
Package: openldap
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have prepared automatic Berkeley DB version upgrade script for sks,
if you want me to do something similar for openldap just ping me, it's
not a big deal after all :)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=30;filename=sks_NMU.diff;att=1;bug=6061
7 matches
Mail list logo
