Bug#616338: refers to nonexistent binary ysh

2011-04-09 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:50:53 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote: > >> so i plan to package libyaml-shell > >> myself. > > i just got the 'accepted into unstable' mail, so i suppose it's time > to clean up the pod and add a suggests (recommends would be a bit strong > imho: the ysh is useful as a teac

Bug#616338: refers to nonexistent binary ysh

2011-04-08 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:35:14 +0200, gregor herrmann writes: >> so i plan to package libyaml-shell >> myself. > >Thank you. >Can you please notify us when the package is in the archive, then we >can close this bug with Recommends or suggests and a patch to the >POD. i just got the 'accepted into un

Bug#616338: refers to nonexistent binary ysh

2011-04-04 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:03:23 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote: > according to the upstream changes doc for 0.67, ysh was split off > into a separate package called YAML::Shell. > http://search.cpan.org/~ingy/YAML-Shell-0.60/ Thanks for the pointer! > it doesn't seem overly feasible to combine mul

Bug#616338: refers to nonexistent binary ysh

2011-04-04 Thread Alexander Zangerl
Package: libyaml-perl Version: 0.71-1 Severity: normal according to the upstream changes doc for 0.67, ysh was split off into a separate package called YAML::Shell. http://search.cpan.org/~ingy/YAML-Shell-0.60/ it doesn't seem overly feasible to combine multiple cpan modules into one debian pack