Alex Romosan wrote:
Hi,
> dude, where did you come up with this stuff? what next, you are going to
> tell me that i have to use gnome, or ext3, or whatever? i can see that
> you think the job of a distribution is to tell users how to use their
> computers (just like microsoft does) so i don't se
Julien BLACHE writes:
> It's not optional as far as Debian is concerned, and that's what
> matters here.
dude, where did you come up with this stuff? what next, you are going to
tell me that i have to use gnome, or ext3, or whatever? i can see that
you think the job of a distribution is to tell
Alex Romosan wrote:
Hi,
>> ACL are required, and that's all. ConsoleKit already requires ACL
>> support and the standard Debian kernel has ACL enabled. If you don't
>> use the standard kernel, now would be a good time to review your
>> custom kernel configuration.
>
> as long as they are still m
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
> ACL are required, and that's all. ConsoleKit already requires ACL
> support and the standard Debian kernel has ACL enabled. If you don't
> use the standard kernel, now would be a good time to review your
> custom kernel configuration.
a
Package: libsane
Version: 1.0.22-1
Severity: important
if ACLs are not enabled in the kernel setfacl fails with 'Operation not
supported' and the permission is not changed for the device file. a
better approach would be to use chgrp and chmod on the device file,
i.e. replace RUN+="/bin/setfacl -m
5 matches
Mail list logo
