Hi,
2011/4/4 Clint Adams :
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:35:03PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
>> I would say we want to install on which ever is mounted under /boot,
>> so if /boot/boot.txt is present, then boot.scr is regenerated
>> everytime kernel is installed.
>
> I think that could be a good thin
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:35:03PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> I would say we want to install on which ever is mounted under /boot,
> so if /boot/boot.txt is present, then boot.scr is regenerated
> everytime kernel is installed.
I think that could be a good thing to do for all platforms.
--
To
Hello,
2011/4/4 Loïc Minier :
> It would be nice if you could file a bug against linux to get the new
> flavor; I personally would recommend -mx5.
That's fine with me. I'll wait for the bug report until we had proper
patches for kernel.
> Technically, mx5 would only support mx51 right now, b
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Finally, is "mx51" going to be the name of the kernel flavour? Can
> > you have mx5 and mx6 in one kernel? What about different mx5x
> > platforms in one kernel?
> I am not sure which kernel flavour we should use, hence I dropped an
> email to debian-a
* Hector Oron [2011-04-04 12:56]:
> Please comments on:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/flash-kernel.git;a=commitdiff;h=fa8fdbc9607ebd892eba1e1c3b4ad12f710c901f
Clint added a boot.scr file in his original patch. Is that no longer
needed.
Also, my previous comments are not addressed:
| Al
Hi Martin,
2011/4/4 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-04-04 12:56]:
>> Please comments on:
>>
>> http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/flash-kernel.git;a=commitdiff;h=fa8fdbc9607ebd892eba1e1c3b4ad12f710c901f
>
> Clint added a boot.scr file in his original patch. Is that no longer
> needed.
I
Hello,
I have added partial support for Efika devices into a branch for you to
review,
after nice work done by Loïc rewritting the base code.
Please comments on:
http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/flash-kernel.git;a=commitdiff;h=fa8fdbc9607ebd892eba1e1c3b4ad12f710c901f
Best regards,
-- Hecto
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:01:05PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Where does loadcmd come from?
U-Boot environment.
> How does this boot.scr work? Does this machine load /boot/boot.scr
> from disk and then execute those commands?
Yes, the current U-Boot image from Genesi is set to search for
* Clint Adams [2011-02-12 23:01]:
> +root=$(readlink -f /dev/root)
> +echo "Root filesystem is $root" >&2
> +
> +loadaddr=0x90008000
> + tmpdir="$(mktemp -d)"
You mix space and tabs, but I can fix that up.
> +# The UUID will come from the flash-kernel config f
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:11:36AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Yeah, you'd think that Clint would know how to submit a proper patch.
My apologies.
--- flash-kernel.sid 2011-02-12 17:41:30.532519059 -0500
+++ flash-kernel.patched 2011-02-12 17:54:16.589578778 -0500
@@ -76,6 +76,69 @@
fi
}
* Christian PERRIER [2011-02-08 06:37]:
> I just diff'ed that file with the one we have in the current
> flash-kernel package and the diff isgiant (bigger than the file,
> actually).
Yeah, you'd think that Clint would know how to submit a proper patch.
I'm not planning to take a look at this
Quoting Clint Adams (cl...@debian.org):
> Package: flash-kernel
> Version: 2.37
>
> The attached file is part of the flash-kernel 2.28ubuntu10genesi1
> distributed by Genesi.
>
> Please incorporate the efikamx_flash_kernel function.
> I would change the boot.scr generation to include
> console=${
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 2.37
The attached file is part of the flash-kernel 2.28ubuntu10genesi1
distributed by Genesi.
Please incorporate the efikamx_flash_kernel function.
I would change the boot.scr generation to include
console=${console} as part of bootargs.
#!/bin/sh
# Copyright (C) 2
13 matches
Mail list logo
