Not that I like to be nit-picking, but...
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 05:39:35PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
> [2011.01.31.1636 +0100]:
> > How can halt, kexec or reboot? ;)
> All of these get loaded to RAM before init(8) starts the shutdown
> process.
Are yo
also sprach Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
[2011.01.31.1636 +0100]:
> How can halt, kexec or reboot? ;)
All of these get loaded to RAM before init(8) starts the shutdown
process.
> Of course you know umountroot doesn't (yet) really umount the root
> filesystem.
Fact is that it's not possible to stop
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:25:05PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
> [2011.01.31.1601 +0100]:
> > One could probably even think about X-Stop-After: umountroot, but
> > I'm not sure about the side-effects.
> Won't work: how should the init.d script run after the
also sprach Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
[2011.01.31.1601 +0100]:
> The attached patch schedules mdadm-raid the same with or without
> cryptsetup or lvm2 installed. It's tested.
Okay, thanks.
> One could probably even think about X-Stop-After: umountroot, but
> I'm not sure about the side-effects.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 03:03:58PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
> [2011.01.26.2235 +0100]:
> > On a system without lvm or cryptsetup installed mdadm-raid stop gets
> > scheduled quite early:
> > ... particularly before umountfs.
> >
> > I'd suggest altering
clone 610421 -1
retitle -1 Alter stop-dependencies to force umountfs before mdadm-raid
severity -1 wishlist
tags -1 help moreinfo
thanks
also sprach Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
[2011.01.26.2235 +0100]:
> Hmmm, I guess since this bug is still open I don't need to create a new
> one :)
In general, it
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:35:59PM +0100, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> with the new Dependency based boot sequence the boot sequencing of
> mdadm's mdadm-raid ad initscripts's hostname.sh changed.
Hmmm, I guess since this bug is still open I don't need to create a new
one :)
I found another i
package mdadm
user initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
usertag 610421 + incorrect-dependency
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: mdadm
Version: 3.1.4-1+8efb9d1
Hello,
with the new Dependency based boot sequence the boot sequencing of
mdadm's mdadm-raid ad initscripts's hostname.sh changed.
With legacy boot sequence mdadm-raid was scheduled after hostname.sh
which especially makes sense with the new v1 superblocks
9 matches
Mail list logo
