On la, 2011-01-15 at 23:38 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I still don't get how the versioned Format URL will look like once DEP5
> will be shipped by debian-policy though. Would it use the Vcs-Browser of
> the debian-policy package or ...? Just curious.
>From http://lists.debian.org/debian-pr
Charles Plessy writes:
> There is another reason why I would not support an alignment on the
> Policy's version number: from the begining we promised that DEP-5 was
> not an attempt to modify the Policy.
I don't recall that promise ever being made. Where did you see it?
The promise in the first
Le Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:38:12PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>
> Well, I was assuming that DEP5 was going to become an "associated text"
> under policy §5.6.11 and, as such, subject to Standards-Version. That
> would bring IMHO various benefits such as: 1) the possibility of
> dropping F
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 23:38:12 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I still don't get how the versioned Format URL will look like once DEP5
> will be shipped by debian-policy though. Would it use the Vcs-Browser of
> the debian-policy package or ...? Just curious.
From the attached diff in the first
[ Cc:-ing policy integration bug report ]
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:51:23PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> There has been no plan to subsume DEP5 into Debian Policy. The only plan
> I've seen is to turn *maintenance* of the machine-readable copyright format
> over to the Debian Policy process an
5 matches
Mail list logo
