Julien Cristau writes:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 22:27:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 10:00 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> Stable update is in the security queue. No word from upstream yet
>>> about when they're going to actually release the advisory. I'll
>>> bother
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607903 squeeze-can-defer
tag 607903 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 22:27:05 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 10:00 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Julien Cristau writes:
> > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 17:54:47
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 10:00 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 17:54:47 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> This is fixed in Git. I'm working with upstream to coordinate a security
> >> release which should be out within the next week, so will upload th
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 17:54:47 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> This is fixed in Git. I'm working with upstream to coordinate a security
>> release which should be out within the next week, so will upload this fix
>> in conjunction with that to avoid confusion, since the
Hi Russ,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 17:54:47 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This is fixed in Git. I'm working with upstream to coordinate a security
> release which should be out within the next week, so will upload this fix
> in conjunction with that to avoid confusion, since the security release is
tags 607903 pending
thanks
This is fixed in Git. I'm working with upstream to coordinate a security
release which should be out within the next week, so will upload this fix
in conjunction with that to avoid confusion, since the security release is
already staged in Git. (I'll rethink this if it
Sorry, that was stupid of me.
That said, dkms's dependencies are weird; it depends on "make |
build-essential | dpkg-dev", which is a rather weird set, since
buildessential depends on make and dpkg-dev, and dpkg-dev itself
depends on make as well. If it really just means 'make', it should
depend o
fixed 607903 openafs-modules-dkms/1.5.77-1
thanks
Phil Miller writes:
> build-essential depends on "libc6-dev | libc-dev", and is assumed for
> building any packages, per Policy 4.2.
Yeah, but DKMS modules are something of a special case because the end
user isn't building the package. They're
Package: openafs-modules-dkms
Version: 1.4.12.1+dfsg-3
Severity: grave
Hi,
dkms can't build the module since it's lacking a dependency on
libc6-dev, from config.log:
configure:3391: $? = 0
configure:3380: gcc -v >&5
Using built-in specs.
Target: arm-linux-gnueabi
Configured with: ../src/configure
9 matches
Mail list logo
