Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread Thomas Osterried
Am Donnerstag, den 09. Dezember 2010 um 01:47:01 Uhr, schrieb John Goerzen in <4d002705.2020...@complete.org>: > On 12/08/2010 06:35 PM, Thomas Osterried wrote: > > Which kernel version do you use? > > 2.6.32 > > > If your way is > >kernel-ax25 -> kissattach -> pty -> ax25ipd -> inet >

Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread John Goerzen
On 12/08/2010 06:35 PM, Thomas Osterried wrote: Which kernel version do you use? 2.6.32 If your way is kernel-ax25 -> kissattach -> pty -> ax25ipd -> inet then kiss packets from kernel-ax25 -> pty never have the kiss byte != \0, except kiss param commands (i.e. setting txdeleay). I'

Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread Thomas Osterried
Am Donnerstag, den 09. Dezember 2010 um 01:03:50 Uhr, schrieb John Goerzen in <4d001ce6.7050...@complete.org>: > On 12/08/2010 03:00 PM, Thomas Osterried wrote: > > No. But you was the wone who suggestet the patch > > "- if (*iframe == '\0' || *iframe == 0x10) { > >

Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread John Goerzen
On 12/08/2010 03:00 PM, Thomas Osterried wrote: No. But you was the wone who suggestet the patch "- if (*iframe == '\0' || *iframe == 0x10) { + if (1) { " After Ralf explained it, I'm in agreement with you that it's wrong. which woul

Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread Thomas Osterried
Am Mittwoch, den 08. Dezember 2010 um 20:09:36 Uhr, schrieb John Goerzen in <4cffd7f0.4070...@complete.org>: > On 12/08/2010 12:31 PM, Thomas Osterried wrote: > > If you patch it to accept kiss-port-3-to-15-packts, then the frames would > > be received. But the code for sendig it is not implem

Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread John Goerzen
On 12/08/2010 12:31 PM, Thomas Osterried wrote: If you patch it to accept kiss-port-3-to-15-packts, then the frames would be received. But the code for sendig it is not implementet, because there's no FROM_PORT3/mycallsign3,myalias3, FROM_PORT4/mycallsign4,.. You'd have to also implement this

Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread Thomas Osterried
> > I'm just wondering why the test isn't (*iframe& 0xf) == 0 which would > > handle the full number of possible 16 possible TNCs. > > That smells like it's a correct solution to me, given what the spec > says. I will compile it with that test and let you know if I see any > issues. The code

Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread John Goerzen
On 12/08/2010 09:38 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote: I have discovered a bug in ax25ipd. I was setting up ax25ipd last night, and it would receive data fine, but wouldn't transmit anything out the IP side. After looking in my log files, I observed this message every time I tried to send a packet out via

Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 08:59:08AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > First of all, thank you very much for your work on the AX.25 > userland tools. It is much appreciated. I am new both to amateur > radio and to AX.25 in general and am thus being exposed to them for > the first time. > > I have disc

Bug#606338: ax25ipd transmission bug

2010-12-08 Thread John Goerzen
Hi Ralf and Thomas, First of all, thank you very much for your work on the AX.25 userland tools. It is much appreciated. I am new both to amateur radio and to AX.25 in general and am thus being exposed to them for the first time. I have discovered a bug in ax25ipd. I was setting up ax25ipd