Hello,
On sekmadienis 12 Gruodis 2010 23:32:39 Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > I can implement the URItoFileName function directly in Perl, or find
> > > some way to access the function directly from Perl. If you could
> > > check if we can get away without these special filenames, that
> > > would be v
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 12:29:12AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On ketvirtadienis 09 Gruodis 2010 00:06:52 Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 22:37:56 Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > Certainly for the apt and aptitude resolvers; for the internal
> > > > resolver, it
Hello,
On ketvirtadienis 09 Gruodis 2010 00:06:52 Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 22:37:56 Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > Certainly for the apt and aptitude resolvers; for the internal
> > > resolver, it's still useful.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to request an update of specific
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:48:37PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 22:37:56 Roger Leigh wrote:
> >
> > Certainly for the apt and aptitude resolvers; for the internal resolver,
> > it's still useful.
> >
> > Is it possible to request an update of specif
Hello,
On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 22:37:56 Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> Certainly for the apt and aptitude resolvers; for the internal resolver,
> it's still useful.
>
> Is it possible to request an update of specific archive components,
> so that we don't need to do a complete fetch of everythin
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:19:44PM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 13:06:23 Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > Ok, the latter is because you removed a key option (that I added some
> > > > time ago) from aptitude command line in
> > > > 80f811184d7c7b06a6a5ec8d646b1eac015df
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 13:06:23 Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > > Ok, the latter is because you removed a key option (that I added some
>> > > time ago) from aptitude command line in
>> > > 80f811184d7c7b06a6a5ec8d646b1eac015dff
Hello,
On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 13:06:23 Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > Ok, the latter is because you removed a key option (that I added some
> > > time ago) from aptitude command line in
> > > 80f811184d7c7b06a6a5ec8d646b1eac015dffa2. That's:
> > >
> > > '-o', "Aptitude::ProblemResolver::Hints:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:28:55AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:08:09AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 02:47:14 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > > I guess now it wants a key. I spotted `sbuild-update --keygen` in the
> > > cha
tags 606278 + patch fixed-upstream
thanks
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 10:28:55AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:08:09AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 02:47:14 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > > I guess now it wants a key. I spotte
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 03:08:09AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 02:47:14 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > I guess now it wants a key. I spotted `sbuild-update --keygen` in the
> > changelog and used it. Now it went much further but failed to pick up
> > re
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 02:47:14AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 01:58:13 Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:38:26AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > > aptitude resolver no longer works in 0.60.6. I suppose it has become
> > > pretty i
Hello,
On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 02:47:14 Modestas Vainius wrote:
> I guess now it wants a key. I spotted `sbuild-update --keygen` in the
> changelog and used it. Now it went much further but failed to pick up
> required build-deps from experimental (attached). Please note that sbuild
> 0.60
Hello,
On trečiadienis 08 Gruodis 2010 01:58:13 Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:38:26AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > aptitude resolver no longer works in 0.60.6. I suppose it has become
> > pretty important because it's the only which supports experimental
> > properly. See s
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:58:13PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:38:26AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> > aptitude resolver no longer works in 0.60.6. I suppose it has become pretty
> > important because it's the only which supports experimental properly. See
> > sample b
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 01:38:26AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> aptitude resolver no longer works in 0.60.6. I suppose it has become pretty
> important because it's the only which supports experimental properly. See
> sample build log below.
> dpkg-deb: failed to open package info file
> `/tm
Package: libsbuild-perl
Version: 0.60.6-1
Severity: important
Hello,
aptitude resolver no longer works in 0.60.6. I suppose it has become pretty
important because it's the only which supports experimental properly. See
sample build log below.
$ sbuild --apt-update -d experimental -s -A phonon-ba
17 matches
Mail list logo
