Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 12/03/10 02:03, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> Would you mind adding a "Bug fixes" entry for this
>> in coreutils' NEWS file? It'd be nice to commit that
>> along with an update of the gnulib submodule to the latest.
>
> Sure, done, with this notice:
>
> cp -u no longer does u
On 12/03/10 02:03, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Would you mind adding a "Bug fixes" entry for this
> in coreutils' NEWS file? It'd be nice to commit that
> along with an update of the gnulib submodule to the latest.
Sure, done, with this notice:
cp -u no longer does unnecessary copying merely becaus
Paul Eggert wrote:
> Good eye! Thanks for the bug report and example. I installed
> the following one-byte patch into gnulib; please give it a try.
> It should propagate into coreutils the next time coreutils
> updates from gnulib.
>
> A test case for this would require two file systems, one with
Good eye! Thanks for the bug report and example. I installed
the following one-byte patch into gnulib; please give it a try.
It should propagate into coreutils the next time coreutils
updates from gnulib.
A test case for this would require two file systems, one with
finer-grained time stamps tha
Thank you for filing a new bug report with GNU.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
As you requested us
X-Debbugs-cc: bug-coreut...@gnu.org, bug-m...@gnu.org
Package: coreutils
Version: 8.5-1
man cp says:
`-u'
`--update'
Do not copy a non-directory that has an existing destination with
the same or newer modification time. If time stamps are being
preserved, the comparison is to the s
6 matches
Mail list logo
