> Yes. If that's it, I'll just add it.
Thank you very much!!!
Best regards,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:15:26PM +0100, Giuseppe Gippa Paterno' wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:03 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > My point was - is a separate package then really necessary? If there
> > are no extra dependencies, and the module is physically small, we
> > could just ship it with
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 14:03 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> My point was - is a separate package then really necessary? If there
> are no extra dependencies, and the module is physically small, we
> could just ship it with the rest.
Well, the module is very very small: just 84Kb "unstripped" and 22Kb
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:25:30PM +0100, Giuseppe Gippa Paterno' wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 13:09 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > Package: freeradius-otp
> > > Depends: freeradius (= ${binary:Version}), ${shlibs:Depends}
> > > Suggests: otpd
> >
> > I didn't check, but is the reason for this
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 13:09 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> > Package: freeradius-otp
> > Depends: freeradius (= ${binary:Version}), ${shlibs:Depends}
> > Suggests: otpd
>
> I didn't check, but is the reason for this because brings in new
> dependencies, or?
The otp module shouldn't add new depen
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 08:11:03PM +0100, Giuseppe Gippa Paterno' wrote:
> Hi! I'm the maintainer of OTPD, an opensource multiprotocol otpd daemon that
> interface with Freeradius.
>
> In order to make it working smoothly, without having to recompile
> freeradius each time, I'd wish to have the f
6 matches
Mail list logo
