Bug#604453: Fwd: Fix the uprobes.ko path when used with remotes

2011-08-17 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi David and Frank, David Smith writes: > The whitelist test is pretty old, and should probably be removed. The > stuff in scripts/kprobes_test is much closer to what I think you want, > but of course it doesn't use systemtap, it tests "raw" kprobes. It > probably wouldn't be that difficult to

Bug#604453: Fwd: Fix the uprobes.ko path when used with remotes

2011-08-15 Thread David Smith
On 08/12/2011 06:27 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > David, can you advise to what extent the results of this whitelist > test could be useful, for example to populate our blacklist? The > number of non-inlined kernel functions is far greater than 963, so > perhaps this default test run just looked a

Bug#604453: Fwd: Fix the uprobes.ko path when used with remotes

2011-08-12 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 02:14:01PM +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > > alibi procedure, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=655904 > > Thanks. I can confirm that these instructions crash > linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64 3.0.0-1 > > at least under xen. OK. So that confirms kernel