On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:38:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.9.1.0
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> The reason for this is that we do our building using dpkg-buildpackage,
> and while binary-arch and binary-indep are required targets used by
> dpk
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:45:28AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Roger Leigh , 2010-11-21, 21:38:
>> I'd like to propose that build-arch and build-indep be changed in
>> Policy from "may be provided" to "must be provided" in preparation
>> for enabling their use. We've wanted to fix the root proble
* Roger Leigh , 2010-11-21, 21:38:
Currently, Build-Depends-Indep isn't useful,
I've heard this many times, but this is not true. B-D-I is useful and
many packages use it successfully.
I'd like to propose that build-arch and build-indep be changed in
Policy from "may be provided" to "must b
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 09:38:31PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> There's some history to this in #374029. Most of the information
> about sbuild/buildds in there is outdated and incorrect. The only
> sticking point to using Build-Depends-Indep and autobuilding
> arch-all packages is the lack of sup
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
As a goal for wheezy, I'd like the Build-Depends and
Build-Depends-Indep fields to be fully functional and usable for
autobuilding. Currently, Build-Depends-Indep isn't useful, and
only Build-Depends is used in practice on
5 matches
Mail list logo
