Hello,
On 18/05/2012 20:51, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 08:49:39PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could you point at which part of the page talks about a license change?
>
> Urg, just saw it. They are now selling licenses...
> Filing for removal of bouml then... (bec
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 08:49:39PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could you point at which part of the page talks about a license change?
Urg, just saw it. They are now selling licenses...
Filing for removal of bouml then... (because the Qt3 removal).
Ana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0500, Jonathan Thomas wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm obviously not the maintainer of this package, but I have been
> >> researching
> >> packages in the Kubuntu and Debian archives that still depend o
It looks like Bouml is now under a non-free license?
http://www.bouml.fr/historic.html
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0500, Jonathan Thomas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm obviously not the maintainer of this package, but I have been research
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:51:42PM -0500, Jonathan Thomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm obviously not the maintainer of this package, but I have been researching
> packages in the Kubuntu and Debian archives that still depend on KDE3/Qt3. I
> found on the official Bouml website that Bouml development
Hello,
I'm obviously not the maintainer of this package, but I have been researching
packages in the Kubuntu and Debian archives that still depend on KDE3/Qt3. I
found on the official Bouml website that Bouml development has been
discontinued except for bugfix maintenance of the latest release:
6 matches
Mail list logo
