Bug#603864: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#603864: acpi-support-base: latest revision; some small improvements

2010-11-18 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:19:16AM +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > > return 1; > > +***^ > > +***not needed > > Is there any non-optical advantage of patching this? Yes. It takes a fe

Bug#603864: [Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#603864: acpi-support-base: latest revision; some small improvements

2010-11-18 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:19:16AM +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > return 1; > +*** ^ > +*** not needed Is there any non-optical advantage of patching this? I don't like adding patches to "only" remove superfluous stuff that doesn't hurt. A

Bug#603864: acpi-support-base: latest revision; some small improvements

2010-11-17 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Package: acpi-support-base Version: 0.137-7 Severity: normal Tags: patch See attached. Motivations (not only on 'policy-funcs'): --- check_policy.diff 2010-11-17 22:23:01.0 +0100 +++ check_policy.cii.diff 2010-11-17 23:04:21.0 +0100 @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ --- acpi-support-0.137