On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:33:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> We've had this issue before. Ultimately:
> - we can mitigate the restriction by making the path shorter, but
> we can't make any guarantees even than since package names and
> version numbers don't have any fixed limit. You still
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 03:54:25PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:33:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > We've had this issue before. Ultimately:
> > - we can mitigate the restriction by making the path shorter, but
> > we can't make any guarantees even than since package na
reassign 602891 src:openvswitch
thanks
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:39:06PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> This isn't an sbuild issue, and we can't reliably work around it in
> sbuild either, for the reasons stated above.
Thank you.
I agree, I'm reassigning it back to openvswitch (with this email).
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:33:33PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:21:59PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > I just built via
> > > | sbuild --apt-update --batch --dist=unstable --arch=powerpcspe \
> >
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:30:17PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Ben Pfaff | 2010-11-09 13:21:59 [-0800]:
>
> >Thanks for the hint. I was able to reproduce the problem locally with
> >sbuild. I'm sure that I can track it down now.
>
> You got the part where I blamed sun_path for b
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 01:21:59PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I just built via
> > | sbuild --apt-update --batch --dist=unstable --arch=powerpcspe \
> > |openvswitch_1.1.0~pre2-2
> > and got the same error message. On
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I just built via
> | sbuild --apt-update --batch --dist=unstable --arch=powerpcspe \
> |openvswitch_1.1.0~pre2-2
> and got the same error message. On buildds it hang in the perl test case
> but here it continued. I jus
* Ben Pfaff | 2010-11-09 09:48:28 [-0800]:
>These tests don't fail for me when I run them locally or on a Debian
>machine (e.g. paganini.debian.org). The testsuite produces more
>information for failed tests, in
>_debian/tests/testsuite.dir//testsuite.log inside the top
>source directory. Is the
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:04:50AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Your package FTBFS on all architectures [0]. Here is a snippet from
> i386[1]:
>
> |daemon unit tests - C
> |
> | 22: daemon FAILED (daemon.at:11)
> | 23: daemon --monitor
9 matches
Mail list logo
