Hi,
On Sonntag, 13. Februar 2011, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> Sorry I haven't had time enouth to even take a look to these changes.
np - thats why I cc:ed you and am happy to answer your (or anybodys
questions) :)
> Will ldap2zone remove previous zones in a bind configuration. I.E. not
>
Hi,
On Sonntag, 13. Februar 2011, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> Having all the infraestructure and information stored in ldap is very
> safe when you have several thousands of ltsp servers and don't want to
> manually modify configuration files whenever a new server is placed or
> moved. More
El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 17:09 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen escribió:
> [José L. Redrejo Rodríguez]
> > Obviously, you're free to do it. From my point of view, these are
> > not good news. In the future, in our schools we're not going to
> > switch back to use bind9 and will keep the current setup w
[José L. Redrejo Rodríguez]
> Obviously, you're free to do it. From my point of view, these are
> not good news. In the future, in our schools we're not going to
> switch back to use bind9 and will keep the current setup with pdns.
> Having all the infraestructure and information stored in ldap is
El dom, 13-02-2011 a las 12:45 +0100, Holger Levsen escribió:
> Hi,
>
> during the Debian Edu meeting here in Zweibrücken we discussed #602863 and
> how
> to solve it. I've asked about 15 people what they'd think about us previously
> using bind9 (until and including etch), then moving to power
Hi,
during the Debian Edu meeting here in Zweibrücken we discussed #602863 and how
to solve it. I've asked about 15 people what they'd think about us previously
using bind9 (until and including etch), then moving to powerdns (in lenny)
and then switching back to bind9 in squeeze. Everybody exce
6 matches
Mail list logo
