[Ritesh Raj Sarraf]
> The bug is more than 4 years old. And no maintainer wants to bring
> it to closure. There's no comment even whether it is something
> correct or not.
I believe cgroup was discussed in http://bugs.debian.org/572733 >
already. Is there something new since that bug report?
--
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: forcemerge 572733 -1
On 11/11/2014 12:54 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Ritesh Raj Sarraf]
>> The bug is more than 4 years old. And no maintainer wants to bring
>> it to closure. There's no comment even whether it is something
>> correct or not.
>
> I be
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 10/29/2010 07:43 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > I like it. Is this mountpoint "blessed" by someone, since it is inside
> > /sys? Are other distros also using this path?
>
> it's the upstream location to mount it, see comments in
> http:
On 10/29/2010 07:43 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> I like it. Is this mountpoint "blessed" by someone, since it is inside
> /sys? Are other distros also using this path?
it's the upstream location to mount it, see comments in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=595964
for
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> attached is the patch.
[...]
> + domount cgroup "" /sys/fs/cgroup cgroup -onodev,noexec,nosuid
I like it. Is this mountpoint "blessed" by someone, since it is inside
/sys? Are other distros also using this path?
--
"One disk to rule
5 matches
Mail list logo
