What was wrong with my own 4.035 build was SpamAssassin's behaviour
(this is what I wrote in my reports, msgs 59 and 64), NOT Noah's test.pl
script. The test script was OK, but from the start I have wanted to
highlight that the SA problem, at the origin of 601601, was still there,
so the test and i
Damian,
I know you tied Noah's test.pl script with your own 4.035 build and
it failed. Could try it with the official 4.035 build? It works for me
and Elimar. The original problem still persisted for Elimar however.
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:11:32AM +, Nicholas
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 10:11:32AM +, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> Damian, Sorry I should have made myself clearer. I was not suggesting
> that Dominique's idea would help - except as very, very long shot.
> Rather We have two bugs in assassin that have at sometime implicated
> NetAddr::IP.
Ok, no problem. Thanks for your explanation.
As the last message in 601601 was refering to 517361, I thought there
was a technical link between the two.
So let's hope some SA hackers will be able to help on these two
issues...
Best,
Damien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ.
Damian, Sorry I should have made myself clearer. I was not suggesting
that Dominique's idea would help - except as very, very long shot.
Rather We have two bugs in assassin that have at sometime implicated
NetAddr::IP. #517361 is a separate bug
but at present I cannot investigate further witho
Sorry to break the thread, I had not subscribed to the bug (done now).
Did a quick test of applying Dominique's suggestion on top of
libnetaddr-ip-perl v4.035, and this doesn't seem to solve the problem
with spamassassin. The message with lead to creation of 601601 is still
appearing.
Please not
Actually if someone is willing to test it in spamassasin I am willing to
put a patched version of NetAddr::IP in experimental to try out
Dominique's suggestion on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=517361. Obviously if
that works I will forward the patch upstream.
Nicholas Bamb
Elimar,
Thanks for the fast response. Based upon this I will pass the ticket
back to the spamassassin package.
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
* Nicholas Bamber [101031 18:54 +]:
Elimar
Please could you download Noah's test script and post us the result. It was
his work that isolated the
* Nicholas Bamber [101031 18:54 +]:
> Elimar
>
> Please could you download Noah's test script and post us the result. It was
> his work that isolated the problem down to the NetAddr::IP module so we
> really need to start from that point.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=3
Elimar
Please could you download Noah's test script and post us the result. It
was his work that isolated the problem down to the NetAddr::IP module so
we really need to start from that point.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=37;filename=test.pl;att=1;bug=601601
Elimar Ries
Package: libnetaddr-ip-perl
Version: 4.035+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
The bug still persists:
r...@baumbart /etc/default # /usr/sbin/amavisd-new-cronjob sa-sync
netset: cannot include 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1/128 as it has already been included
netset: cannot include 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1/128 as it has already be
11 matches
Mail list logo
