Bug#599740: apt-listbugs is written in ruby

2012-09-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 18:11:33 -0700 Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Francesco, Hello Jonathan, nice to read you! :-) [...] > Do you mind if I close this? My plan was to close this bug report after managing to support Ruby 1.9.x with apt-listbugs, but, oh well, I guess it has stayed open for long en

Bug#599740: apt-listbugs is written in ruby

2012-09-10 Thread Thomas Koch
Control: done Since I opened it, I can also close it. However apt-listbugs annoyed me a few times with errors coming from some ruby api changes breaking apt-listbugs. Since I'm learning D, might be a fun project to write apt-listbugs in D... :-) Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#599740: apt-listbugs is written in ruby

2012-09-09 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Francesco, In 2010, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:30:14 +0200 Thomas Koch wrote: >> Please keep this bug open for at least some months to collect thoughts >> on this subject. > > I can keep this bug report open for some time, since you ask me to do > so. Do you mind if I clos

Bug#599740: apt-listbugs: is written in ruby

2010-10-10 Thread Francesco Poli
found 599740 apt-listbugs/0.0.1 tags 599740 + wontfix thanks On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:30:14 +0200 Thomas Koch wrote: > Package: apt-listbugs > Version: 0.1.3 > Severity: wishlist > > I know that this may sound like trolling, but I do seriously believe, > that ruby should not be used for any piece

Bug#599740: apt-listbugs: is written in ruby

2010-10-10 Thread Thomas Koch
Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.3 Severity: wishlist I know that this may sound like trolling, but I do seriously believe, that ruby should not be used for any piece inside the Debian system. People may choose to package some software written in ruby, but apt-listbugs is not any piece of random