On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:42:15 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 19.12.2010 20:30, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:16:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> >>reopen 599534
> >>thanks
> >>
> >>see #606680
> >>
> >What am I supposed to see there?
>
> the separate issue mention
On 19.12.2010 20:30, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:16:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
reopen 599534
thanks
see #606680
What am I supposed to see there?
the separate issue mentioned in your citation, which is processed by the release
team, and packages migrated to testin
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:16:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> reopen 599534
> thanks
>
> see #606680
>
What am I supposed to see there?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reopen 599534
thanks
see #606680
On 18.12.2010 15:03, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 17:28:30 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-distutils-extras 2.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-distutils-extras 2.22-1. The main reason
for this request is that the current version now builds a python3
package, which was meant to go into squeeeze (however
5 matches
Mail list logo