Bug#598616: cuneiform: development package is needed

2011-01-31 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Dmitry Katsubo , 2011-01-28, 13:03: 1. A few types and constants defined in cuneiform.h have very generic names ("enum Languages", "Bool", "LANG_ENGLISH" etc.). This is not something acceptable in a public header file, and these names could easily conflict with other names in user's code. Yes

Bug#598616: cuneiform: development package is needed

2011-01-28 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 28.01.2011 0:55, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > * Dmitry Katsubo , 2011-01-21, 13:36: >> I attach the trivial solution for the bug: the library header >> cuneiform.h is packaged as libcuneiform-dev.deb > > Apart from being trivial it is also wrong. :) It is just a proposal, which of cours

Bug#598616: cuneiform: development package is needed

2011-01-27 Thread Jakub Wilk
Hi Dmitry, * Dmitry Katsubo , 2011-01-21, 13:36: I attach the trivial solution for the bug: the library header cuneiform.h is packaged as libcuneiform-dev.deb Apart from being trivial it is also wrong. :) With this patch applied it is (still) not possible to link to libcuneiform without jump

Bug#598616: cuneiform: development package is needed

2011-01-21 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
Version: 1.0.0+dfsg-1 I attach the trivial solution for the bug: the library header cuneiform.h is packaged as libcuneiform-dev.deb Please consider for inclusion. Perhaps it also makes sense to split "cuneiform" package into "cuneiform" (binary only) and "libcuneiform" (.so only) and update the

Bug#598616: cuneiform: development package is needed

2010-10-02 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
Jakub Wilk wrote on 01.10.2010 13:11: > Why do you need a static library in the first place? There is an intention to reduce the number of 3-rd party dependencies (e.g. use static linking is possible) to: * make the results of recognition robust to changes in these libraries, so the results are re

Bug#598616: cuneiform: development package is needed

2010-10-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Dmitry Katsubo , 2010-10-01, 12:47: I have fired a request at cuneiform bugtracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cuneiform-linux/+bug/652883 I hope .a will be available as well (usually it is not a big deal). Why do you need a static library in the first place? -- Jakub Wilk signature.asc D

Bug#598616: cuneiform: development package is needed

2010-10-01 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
On 30.09.2010 21:14, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Fixing this bug is non-trivial and I don't currently have time to work > on it. However, I will be happy to accept a patch if you provide one. As it uses cmake, it is not trivial for me. At least one can include which is installed. I have fired a request

Bug#598616: cuneiform: development package is needed

2010-09-30 Thread Jakub Wilk
tags 598616 + confirmed help thanks Fixing this bug is non-trivial and I don't currently have time to work on it. However, I will be happy to accept a patch if you provide one. -- Jakub Wilk signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#598616: cuneiform: development package is needed

2010-09-30 Thread Dmitry Katsubo
Package: cuneiform Version: 0.7.0+dfsg.1-1 Severity: wishlist It would be nice to have also a development package for this project (e.g. cuneiform-dev) that includes: - Static library(-ies) (*.a) - Necessary headers (*.h) Thanks in advance! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ..