Bug#598408: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2011-01-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 04:29 +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > ( > For the record, more discussion followed on the debian-kernel list. > Ben Hutchings made[0] the "discardable" part explicit there: > > By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the > memory used for its

Bug#598408: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2011-01-15 Thread intrigeri
Hi, ( For the record, more discussion followed on the debian-kernel list. Ben Hutchings made[0] the "discardable" part explicit there: By 'discardable' I mean that it would be possible to free the memory used for its code and static data if it was not used (similar to the way init

Bug#598408: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-06 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 03:43 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello Kernel Team, > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings > > The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what > the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ? Only if we can find a way

Bug#598408: Paris MiniDebConf Minutes

2010-11-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Kernel Team, http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel/Meetings The wiki lists most items marked as done. I am just curious to know what the decision has been made for AppArmor. Will it be enabled ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System