Bug#597251: nmu: libppl-swi_0.10.2-8

2010-09-21 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 18/09/2010 10:36, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto: > Before I schedule a 22-hour build to get one binary package back :) I'm > assuming dak can't easily be persuaded to re-introduce the old version > of the package? (I'm guessing not given the time since removal, but it's > always worth asking...) U

Bug#597251: nmu: libppl-swi_0.10.2-8

2010-09-18 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il giorno Sat, 18 Sep 2010 09:36:57 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" ha scritto: > That should be ppl, i.e. the source package. Ups, sorry. > Before I schedule a 22-hour build to get one binary package back :) I'm > assuming dak can't easily be persuaded to re-introduce the old version > of the package?

Bug#597251: nmu: libppl-swi_0.10.2-8

2010-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 08:47 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > I erroneously removed libppl-swi_0.10.2-8 from hppa instead of mips > (see #596501), so I ask a binNMU on hppa to restore removed binary. > > nmu libppl-swi_0.10.2-8 . hppa . -m "Rebuild for erroneous removal" That should be ppl, i.e. the

Bug#597251: nmu: libppl-swi_0.10.2-8

2010-09-17 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu I erroneously removed libppl-swi_0.10.2-8 from hppa instead of mips (see #596501), so I ask a binNMU on hppa to restore removed binary. nmu libppl-swi_0.10.2-8 . hppa . -m "Rebuild for erron