Hello Steve,
On Monday 21 March 2011 19:29:48 Steve Langasek wrote:
> I understand this issue is reported to be fixed in later upstream versions
> of cifs-utils. Is that the source of this patch, or did upstream fix it
> differently?
Upstream fixed it differently. I did not look for new upstream
Hola Steve Langasek!
El 21/03/2011 a las 11:29 escribiste:
> I understand this issue is reported to be fixed in later upstream versions
> of cifs-utils. Is that the source of this patch, or did upstream fix it
> differently?
A quick check to the cifs-utils 4.9 source seems to indicate that no ch
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 04:41:13PM +0100, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> could the original bug submitter or someone willing to test please try out
> the
> attached patch?
> It can be applied like this:
> $ apt-get source cifs-utils
> $ cd cifs-utils-4.5
> $ patch < prevent-trailing-slash.diff
> $
Hola Bastian Kleineidam!
El 21/03/2011 a las 16:41 escribiste:
> could the original bug submitter or someone willing to test please try out
> the
> attached patch?
> It can be applied like this:
> $ apt-get source cifs-utils
> $ cd cifs-utils-4.5
> $ patch < prevent-trailing-slash.diff
> $ debu
Hi,
could the original bug submitter or someone willing to test please try out the
attached patch?
It can be applied like this:
$ apt-get source cifs-utils
$ cd cifs-utils-4.5
$ patch < prevent-trailing-slash.diff
$ debuild binary
[...]
$ sudo dpkg -i ../cifs-utils*.deb
Thanks,
Bastian
--- mo
Package: libpam-mount
Version: 2.5-3
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
Hi,
After migrating to squeeze I've been having difficulties with
libpam-mount. One of them is that it fails to detect the already mounted
cifs setups, so the cifs entries get mounted on each authentication.
Tracking t
6 matches
Mail list logo
