On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:21:37PM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 01:00:51PM +, Athanasius wrote:
> > aptitude -t lenny-backports install openswan
> >
> > telling it to keep my current config and it's working.
>
> So may I close this bug report as solved - as 2.4 is depr
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 01:00:51PM +, Athanasius wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:14:12PM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> > could you please try the openswan 2.6 version from lenny-backports and see
> > if
> > the problem got solved there?
>
> Yes, that appears to be working perfectly. A s
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:14:12PM +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> could you please try the openswan 2.6 version from lenny-backports and see if
> the problem got solved there?
Yes, that appears to be working perfectly. A simple:
aptitude -t lenny-backports install openswan
telling it to keep my
Dear Athanasius,
could you please try the openswan 2.6 version from lenny-backports and see if
the problem got solved there?
Kind regards
Harald Jenny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Dear Athanasius,
if I understand you correctly the problem is that your android device is
currently on the same network as your server and that openswan is adding
a route for the host is this what you mean? I estimate you are using NETKEY
(the built-in IPSec stack from Debian kernel)? For this to
Package: openswan
Version: 1:2.4.12+dfsg-1.3+lenny2
Severity: important
In trying to get an L2TP/IPSec tunnel up from my Android-based phone to
my server for use when on untrusted WiFi I've obviously been testing it
at home.
So I have a WiFi Access Point on 192.168.11.0/24, my server on .1, th
6 matches
Mail list logo
