Guillem Jover writes:
> On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 12:57:50 +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 17:05 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> Our footnote system is not great, so I'd keep it as one footnote. I agree
>>> with putting GNU/Hurd first, but I'd like to keep the structure of list
Hi!
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 12:57:50 +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 17:05 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Our footnote system is not great, so I'd keep it as one footnote. I agree
> > with putting GNU/Hurd first, but I'd like to keep the structure of listing
> > the exceptions
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 17:05 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Andrew McMillan writes:
>
> > I would change the text around a little to add that to the beginning of
> > the paragraph, something like:
>
> > On GNU/Hurd systems the /hurd and
> > /servers directories are also allowed in t
Andrew McMillan writes:
> I would change the text around a little to add that to the beginning of
> the paragraph, something like:
> On GNU/Hurd systems the /hurd and
> /servers directories are also allowed in the root
> filesystem. These directories are used to store
>
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 09:08 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Source: debian-policy
> Source-Version: 3.9.1.0
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi!
>
> Here's a draft patch to add an FHS exception for the two top-level
> directories GNU/Hurd uses.
Hi
Source: debian-policy
Source-Version: 3.9.1.0
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Hi!
Here's a draft patch to add an FHS exception for the two top-level
directories GNU/Hurd uses.
It might make sense to merge with the /sys and /selinux paragraph, and
the foo
6 matches
Mail list logo
