On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:14:46PM -0500, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> Ben,
>
> Thank you for your attention to this bug.
>
> I have to wonder: let's say I have both grub and lilo packages, and I
> have in the past used one or the other... how will this new policy play
> out? I'd think that I'd hav
Ben,
Thank you for your attention to this bug.
I have to wonder: let's say I have both grub and lilo packages, and I
have in the past used one or the other... how will this new policy play
out? I'd think that I'd have to make a choice in /etc/alternate, or dpkg
configure, rather than have the
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 04:43 -0500, Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
> Package: lilo
> Version: 1:22.8-8.2
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
The kernel is most certainly not 'unrelated' to lilo.
> Severity: critical
> Tags: sid
>
> The lilo package is installed but /etc/lilo.conf is missing; at pr
Package: lilo
Version: 1:22.8-8.2
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Severity: critical
Tags: sid
The lilo package is installed but /etc/lilo.conf is missing; at present
I use grub.
In the latest update of lilo, I can no longer install kernel updates, as
seen in the following output:
4 matches
Mail list logo
