Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 à 23:38 +0200, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> > > Why do you need to compress the kernel? It should be a zImage or
> > > LZMA-image already anywhere.
> >
> > Yeah, I know, that's a bit tricky (I commented it on the d-i target, but
> > I haven't sent it yet).
> > So, U-Bo
* Thibaut Girka [2010-08-31 23:43]:
> If you're talking about the discussion in #503292, then yes, s3c24xx was
> decided.
Ok, that's fine then.
> There is already basic (really basic, no display or even µSD) support in
> mainline kernel, and the name is "GTA02".
Ok.
> > Why do you need to comp
Le mardi 31 août 2010 à 22:29 +0100, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Thibaut GIRKA [2010-08-16 16:15]:
> > -XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x
> > +XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x s3c24xx
>
> Is s3c24xx what was decided in the end? I remember there was a lot of
* Thibaut GIRKA [2010-08-16 16:15]:
> -XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x
> +XB-Subarchitecture: iop32x ixp4xx kirkwood orion5x s3c24xx
Is s3c24xx what was decided in the end? I remember there was a lot of
discussion of s3c vs s3c24xx but I cannot remember the outcome.
> +
Package: flash-kernel-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please add support for the gta02.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (120, 'unstable'), (105, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-rc3+
5 matches
Mail list logo
