Julien Cristau wrote:
> What's up with this? Do we still need more updates in squeeze?
I would like to upload version 4.999.9beta+20100927-1 to unstable.
Changes since 20100810 (testing):
* New snapshot, taken from upstream commit cec0ddc.
- liblzma: The meaning of --extreme has been twea
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 22:20:19 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> XZ Utils 5.0.0 is likely to be released some time in the next few
>> weeks.
[...]
> What's up with this? Do we still need more updates in squeeze?
Yes. Something close to what I would like to see in squeez
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 22:20:19 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> XZ Utils 5.0.0 is likely to be released some time in the next few
> weeks. As the upstream maintainer explains:
>
> | In case of XZ Utils, a stable release is a promise about API, ABI, and
> | command line syntax compatibility long
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> My eyes saw:
>
>> * The soname of liblzma (upstream, at least) will be liblzma.so.5.
>
> and my disk said "liblzma.so.2". They started to fight each other and I had
> to answer quickly.
Quite understandable. This must be the least pleasant part of working on
the release tea
On 0, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> Please reread my message. I would like not to bump the soname, since
> there is nothing to bump soname for.
>
Right. I'll reread the patches then. My eyes saw:
> * The soname of liblzma (upstream, at least) will be liblzma.so.5.
and my disk said "liblzma.so.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 592300 freeze-exception
thanks
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> This is not a freeze-exception for your package only but rather a request
> to start a new transition.
Sorry about my last reply; I am a little sensitive about this because of
http://bugs.de
On 0, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> This is not a freeze-exception for your package only but rather a request
> to start a new transition. Let me recall that there was a transition
> freeze announced a while ago.
Hum... actually, we are even frozen, which means "no new transitions".
It really depends
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> This is not a freeze-exception for your package only but rather a request
> to start a new transition. Let me recall that there was a transition
> freeze announced a while ago. Thus, it's very unlikely that we accept this
> transition for Squeeze.
Please reread my message.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 592300 transition
thanks
On 0, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: freeze-exception
>
This is not a freeze-exception for your package only but r
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
The following is just a heads up; I have not prepared the uploads yet.
XZ Utils 5.0.0 is likely to be released some time in the next few
weeks. As the upstream maintainer explai
10 matches
Mail list logo
