Bug#592165: doc-rfc: depend on doc-rfc-experimental

2010-08-08 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 07:46 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > Depends on what you're actually trying to do. As the description says, > feel free to remove the metapackage and install the rfcs that you need. > It's there just to help initial users who don't exactly know what RFCs > they want, as as startin

Bug#592165: doc-rfc: depend on doc-rfc-experimental

2010-08-07 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:18:45AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Package: doc-rfc > Version: 20100731-1 > Severity: wishlist > > > Hi. > > I guess doc-rfc should also depend on doc-rfc-experimental. > Or even better, as doc-rfc is just kind of a meta-package, as far as I can > see, >

Bug#592165: doc-rfc: depend on doc-rfc-experimental

2010-08-07 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Package: doc-rfc Version: 20100731-1 Severity: wishlist Hi. I guess doc-rfc should also depend on doc-rfc-experimental. Or even better, as doc-rfc is just kind of a meta-package, as far as I can see, replace all the depends with recommends. Wouldn't that be more flexible? Cheers, Chris. --