Bug#591404: gscan2pdf: libforks-perl could be removed

2010-08-03 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:18:17 +0200 Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > squeeze has libforks-perl 0.33-1, which seems to build OK. If 0.34-1 > doesn't build cleanly on all architectures, then it won't move to > testing, but surely the version in testing has no RC bug and can > therefore stay? > > Or have I

Bug#591404: gscan2pdf: libforks-perl could be removed

2010-08-03 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
squeeze has libforks-perl 0.33-1, which seems to build OK. If 0.34-1 doesn't build cleanly on all architectures, then it won't move to testing, but surely the version in testing has no RC bug and can therefore stay? Or have I misunderstood things? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-r

Bug#591404: gscan2pdf: libforks-perl could be removed

2010-08-02 Thread Neil Williams
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:34:20 +0200 Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > On 2 August 2010 21:48, Neil Williams wrote: > > It is possible (even likely) that libforks-perl will have to be removed from > > testing but it would appear that gscan2pdf could revert to the internal perl > > threading support (as in

Bug#591404: gscan2pdf: libforks-perl could be removed

2010-08-02 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On 2 August 2010 21:48, Neil Williams wrote: > It is possible (even likely) that libforks-perl will have to be removed from > testing but it would appear that gscan2pdf could revert to the internal perl > threading support (as in previous releases) as part of the fix for the RC bug > against gscan

Bug#591404: gscan2pdf: libforks-perl could be removed

2010-08-02 Thread Neil Williams
Package: gscan2pdf Version: 0.9.31-1 Severity: important It is possible (even likely) that libforks-perl will have to be removed from testing but it would appear that gscan2pdf could revert to the internal perl threading support (as in previous releases) as part of the fix for the RC bug against g