Hi Nicolas,
thanks for the explanation. I've removed the jython support from the
freemarker package. An upstream bug report has already been filed but
there is no response yet.
Cheers,
Torsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 09:23:01PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> reassign 591109 jython
> affects 591109 + libfreemarker-java
> thanks
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> you have changed the jython package in a way which does not follow the
> Debian Java Policy. The package ships a tree of class files instead
reassign 591109 jython
affects 591109 + libfreemarker-java
thanks
Hi Nicolas,
you have changed the jython package in a way which does not follow the
Debian Java Policy. The package ships a tree of class files instead of
a jar file as in Lenny. I haven't even found any information about the
change
Source: libfreemarker-java
Version: 2.3.16-2
Severity: serious
Tags: squeeze sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100731 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/fake
4 matches
Mail list logo
