On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 02:57:59PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > If we still want to keep cfdisk in d-i, then we should reassign this
> > bug to libncurses5, asking for the creation of a udeb.
> >
> > But, do we want to ke
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> If we still want to keep cfdisk in d-i, then we should reassign this
> bug to libncurses5, asking for the creation of a udeb.
>
> But, do we want to keep a udeb of cfdisk?
I see no reason to maintain a udeb for cfdisk for squeeze
Quoting Holger Wansing (li...@wansing-online.de):
> In testing daily builds, cfdisk is no more usable, because
> libncurses is missing.
>
> In preparation of squeeze release, the package dependencies
> of cfdisk have been changed, a Depends to libncurses5 has been
> added, but there is no udeb exi
In testing daily builds, cfdisk is no more usable, because
libncurses is missing.
In preparation of squeeze release, the package dependencies
of cfdisk have been changed, a Depends to libncurses5 has been
added, but there is no udeb existing for libncurses5.
So, cfdisk is useless for d-i ATM.
H
4 matches
Mail list logo
