Hi Kanru,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 08:34:34PM +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> Ouch! The rendering result looks horrible.
Agreed. :-)
> But I can not reproduce the result. I've tested it on both x86 and
> x86_64 machine, all rendered well and correctly.
This machine is a plain sid amd64 and I took th
Okay, it might be caused by the overly aggressive optimization rules in
CFLAGS. Currently the binary would not work as expected on arch that
doesn't support SSE2 / vectorize instruction.
I'll do more test and upload a new version.
- Kanru
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@
tags 590245 unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:28:06 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Package: mupdf
> Version: 0.6-1
> Severity: important
>
> Although mupdf claims to be a high quality renderer my initial
> experience with it is quite contrary.
>
> The ugliness of the rendering is
3 matches
Mail list logo
