On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
Hey, Norbert :)
>> My work, based on what was already done is available at
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/mapreri-guest/sigil.git
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/mapreri-guest/flightcrew.git
>> (they a
Hi Mattia,
> I took a look at both flightcrew and sigil.
Great work, thanks for that!
> My work, based on what was already done is available at
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/mapreri-guest/sigil.git
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/mapreri-guest/flightcrew.git
> (they are c
Hi!
I took a look at both flightcrew and sigil.
* I successful repacked sigil to remove the useless bundled copies
(and the minified jquery):
+ src/Sigil/Resource_Files/javascript/jquery-1.6.2.min.js
+ src/FlightCrew
+ src/BoostParts
+ src/hunspell
+ src/minizip
+ src/utf8-cpp
+ src/Xerces
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The problem is that flightcrew contains non-DFSG-free source files which
> > cannot be distributed in main. I have partially re-implemented them from
>
> You mean src/FlightCrew/Misc/CustomAssert.{cpp,h}
Hi Don,
thanks for your answer.
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The problem is that flightcrew contains non-DFSG-free source files which
> cannot be distributed in main. I have partially re-implemented them from
You mean src/FlightCrew/Misc/CustomAssert.{cpp,h}
I didn't find any oth
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, Norbert Preining wrote:
> since it seems nothing is going on here, I have packaged sigil 0.7.4
> and it is built with the builtin flightcrew, as long as that one is
> not packaged.
The problem is that flightcrew contains non-DFSG-free source files which
cannot be distributed i
Hi Don, hi all,
since it seems nothing is going on here, I have packaged sigil 0.7.4
and it is built with the builtin flightcrew, as long as that one is
not packaged.
I know that Sigil has been more or less stopped development in favor
of Calibre's editor. But as much as I like calibre for managi
On Sat, 26 Oct 2013, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Any updates Don, to flightcrew ?
I'm finishing up the final testing of sigil, and am about to start
working on flightcrew itself.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
My spelling ability, or rather the lack thereof, is one
Hi all,
Any updates Don, to flightcrew ?
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल
My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com
065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17
--
To UN
On Sun, 07 Jul 2013, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> Any news on the sigil/flightcrew packaging?
I am current stuck on either getting a clean-room implementation of the
DTD that I identified earlier, or disabling checks of that DTD in sigil.
Patches accepted.
> Anywhere we can peruse the actual package
Also note that there's a ubuntu package here:
https://launchpad.net/~rgibert/+archive/ebook
maybe they have a flightcrew package too?
--
Why bother building more nukes until we use the ones we already have?
pgpYoHRIgFvff.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hey Don,
Any news on the sigil/flightcrew packaging? Anywhere we can peruse the
actual package source? What's the word from upstream regarding the
license problem you found?
Thanks!
A.
pgp7kX762CWbV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Control: owner -1 d...@debian.org
Control: retitle 590180 ITP: sigil -- A WYSIWYG ebook editor
As flightcrew is required for sigil, no progress appears to have been
made on packaging flightcrew, and I would to package sigil rapidly, I
am hijacking the ITP of flightcrew. I plan on maintaining fligh
noowner 590180
retitle 590180 RFP: sigil -- A WYSIWYG ebook editor
thanks
This ITP is now more than two years old and we haven't heard from the
owner in more than year despite a few pings. And I (and other people
as well, I'm sure!) still really want Sigil in Debian. :)
Both Don Armstrong and the
block 590180 by 614183
block 590180 by 602781
tags 590180 - pending
thanks
I removed the pending tag.
This is still not clear what happen exactly to this package. Is anyone
actually working on ? As per 590180#43 there should be some work done
at:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/s
> I found myself looking for sigil once again; what's the current status
> of this ITP? It would be ideal to at least get a preliminary git
> repository going, which can be sanitized of non-free code (if
> necessary) before putting it into the collab-maint repository.
It has been almost a year wi
I found myself looking for sigil once again; what's the current status
of this ITP? It would be ideal to at least get a preliminary git
repository going, which can be sanitized of non-free code (if
necessary) before putting it into the collab-maint repository.
If you don't have time to maintain si
Hello Hans, Dan and company! :)
This ITP has been in halt for some time. Is any work being done? What's the
current state of the package?
Cheers,
Dan
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpbipPqbzVqr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi John,
As promised in my previous mail, here is a set of patch to
make flightcrew use system libs and to allow installing
flightcrew and XercesExtensions as a shared library.
Note that the 11th patch also allows building zipios as
a shared lib. I'm not using this atm since zipios is only
used
Hi John,
Short self intro: I'm a Linux enthusiast / developer. One of the
things I do is package various software for Fedora. I also
recently got an ebook reader, and as such got interested in Sigil.
I've read: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590180
So I know t
Hi,
I've uploaded my patches to http://fedora.danny.cz/sigil/
And BTW the git version of Sigil started to bundle hunspell and pcre
libraries, hopefully unmodified ...
I also think that the modified zlib in ZipArchive is a showstopper
because it's in fact a demo of commercial library. Ideally we'
Hi,
I spent some time on Sigil last weekend and the result can be seen at
http://fedora.danny.cz/danny/development/SRPMS/repoview/index.html
ZipArchive is unbundled, Sigil builds with system zlib and boost (thanks
to the patches here), also uses system xerces-c if version >= 3.1 is
available (as
Hi!
Dan Horák writes:
>
> Hello Debian maintainers,
>
> I tried to look at packaging Sigil for Fedora and found your packaging
> request for Debian. In one word it's a nightmare, not only there are
> bundled copies of libraries, but they are usually also modified, making
> their unbundling almos
Hello Debian maintainers,
I tried to look at packaging Sigil for Fedora and found your packaging
request for Debian. In one word it's a nightmare, not only there are
bundled copies of libraries, but they are usually also modified, making
their unbundling almost impossible :-(
My observations are
Hi there.
On Jun 10 2011, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> "Benj. Mako Hill" writes:
> > Thanks everyone for your work so far to get Sigil into Debian. I've
> > noticed that it's been a few months since this bug was updated.
> >
> > I'm willing to put in an evening of work or two to help package
> > depende
"Benj. Mako Hill" writes:
> Hello Kanru (and others!)
>
> Thanks everyone for your work so far to get Sigil into Debian. I've
> noticed that it's been a few months since this bug was updated.
>
> I'm willing to put in an evening of work or two to help package
> dependencies or do other work to g
Hello Kanru (and others!)
Thanks everyone for your work so far to get Sigil into Debian. I've
noticed that it's been a few months since this bug was updated.
I'm willing to put in an evening of work or two to help package
dependencies or do other work to get this package uploaded. Do you
have a
Hi,
(ccing the bug report)
Pierre Haessig writes:
> Hello Kanru,
> I've seen from Debian BTS
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590180) that you were
> planning to package Sigile back in January. I have not seen Sigile in
> the Debian packet database yet,
Hello Masayuki & happy new year!
I plan to prepare a updateed Sigil package based on your 0.2.3 version
(upstream is 0.3.2 now), it will take about 5-7 days. If there was
still no response from you since then, I will upload it for new
processing directly.
I'm looking forward to hearing form you!
Hi,
I am interested to ebook editing and want to use Sigil in Debian. What
is the current status of this package? I am volunteered if you need
help!
Cheers,
Kanru
--
A badly written book is only a blunder. A bad translation of a good
book is a crime.
-- Gilbert Highet
--
T
Hi,
I cooked up .deb for Sigil
http://people.debian.org/~mhatta/debian/sigil/
I'll upload these soon if nobody else is interested much.
Best regards,
MH
$
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sigil
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Strahinja Marković
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/sigil/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A WYSIWYG ebook editor
Sigil is a multi-platform WYS
32 matches
Mail list logo
