-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 07/22/2010 08:33 AM, Neil Brown wrote:
>> on Debian, though I'm still running 2.6.32-5-amd64. I doubt that would
>> make a difference, but it might.
>
> And if fact it does. I found a 2.6.34 kernel and hit the same bug.
>
> The mdadm bug i
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:15:32 +1000
Neil Brown wrote:
> on Debian, though I'm still running 2.6.32-5-amd64. I doubt that would
> make a difference, but it might.
And if fact it does. I found a 2.6.34 kernel and hit the same bug.
The mdadm bug is fixed by upstream commit
c03ef02d92e4b2a7397f72
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 15:49:22 +0200
Björn Påhlsson wrote:
.
> # mdadm --verbose --grow /dev/md0 --level=raid6 --raid-devices=4
>
> The output of that last command is:
>
> mdadm level of /dev/md0 changed to raid6
> Segmentation fault
>
When I try that (thanks for providing precise commands!
Package: mdadm
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: normal
Assuming /dev/md0 is not used, the following commands can be used to
reproduce a segmentation fault in the mdadm command:
# for a in dev0 dev1 dev2 dev3; do dd if=/dev/zero count=256 bs=$((1024*1024))
of="$a"; done
# for a in 0 1 2 3; do losetup /
4 matches
Mail list logo
