Mandi! Steve Langasek
In chel di` si favelave...
> Ah - have read the upstream post now, and understand that this is about
> adding users to groups based on whether they're already a member of another
> group.
Yes.
> That doesn't make sense to me, frankly; I think it makes more sense to grant
tags 589019 -moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 06:19:47AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "NSS groups". Perhaps the second
> URL above would answer this, but I'm offline at the moment so can't check
> (and anyway, bug reports should stand alone, wi
tags 589019 moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:12:20PM +0200, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Package: libpam-modules
> Version: 1.0.1-5+lenny1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> pam_group support NIS netgroups to assign (local) group to (indeed)
> netgroups.
> But today NIS setup are really unc
Package: libpam-modules
Version: 1.0.1-5+lenny1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
pam_group support NIS netgroups to assign (local) group to (indeed)
netgroups.
But today NIS setup are really uncommon, and enable the NIS netgroup
''layer'' (objectclasses) and stuffs in LDAP only to manage this...
Pl
4 matches
Mail list logo
