Hi!
Am 13.07.2010 19:42, schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
> While it clearly violates the Debian Policy, I fail to see how it render
> the package undistributable. None of the licenses used in QEMU requires
> to have a file mentioning all the copyright holder and all the licenses.
Thanks for fixing the b
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 13:25:40 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:11:17PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> >
> >notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
> >documentation and/
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 01:11:17PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:42:50 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > While it clearly violates the Debian Policy, I fail to see how it render
> > the package undistributable. None of the licenses used in QEMU requires
> > to have a file mentioni
On Tuesday 13 July 2010 19:42:50 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> While it clearly violates the Debian Policy, I fail to see how it render
> the package undistributable. None of the licenses used in QEMU requires
> to have a file mentioning all the copyright holder and all the licenses.
I guess it is a mat
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:59:09PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Package: qemu
> Version: 0.12.4+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Incomplete copyright file
>
>
> Hi!
>
> The copyright file for qemu is far from being complete. In fact: In
> renders the package undistribut
Package: qemu
Version: 0.12.4+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Incomplete copyright file
Hi!
The copyright file for qemu is far from being complete. In fact: In
renders the package undistributable, as at least the BSD licensed parts as
well as their copyright holders need to be mentione
6 matches
Mail list logo
