On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 22:02:00 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > as they cannot be hardlinked it needs to create a new
> > symlink with the same contents as the one. But as this one is
> > a newly created object it needs the permissions and SE Linux labe
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Guillem Jover wrote:
> as they cannot be hardlinked it needs to create a new
> symlink with the same contents as the one. But as this one is
> a newly created object it needs the permissions and SE Linux labels
> applied to it, otherwise if we need to roll-back with rename(2
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 15:20:29 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > For files in /usr/sbin it seems that both code paths that call
> > > set_selinux_path_context() are being executed, it would be good if we
> > > could only call set_selinux_path_context() o
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > For files in /usr/sbin it seems that both code paths that call
> > set_selinux_path_context() are being executed, it would be good if we
> > could only call set_selinux_path_context() once as it's not the fastest
> > function...
>
> The two calls shou
Hi!
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 17:00:20 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.15.7.2
> Severity: normal
>
> The mode parameter to the matchpathcon() is used for the format type (IE file,
> dir, etc) NOT for the permission bits. So the mask in the
> set_selinux_path_context() functi
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.7.2
Severity: normal
The mode parameter to the matchpathcon() is used for the format type (IE file,
dir, etc) NOT for the permission bits. So the mask in the
set_selinux_path_context() function discards all the bits that we want. While
the man page matchpathcon(3) isn
6 matches
Mail list logo
